RT @_ppmv: @dale_wen @RealTadzioM Two years ago there was a minor hurricane in the climate-energy-nerd-community water glass triggered by t…

RT @_ppmv: @dale_wen @RealTadzioM Two years ago there was a minor hurricane in the climate-energy-nerd-community water glass triggered by t…

RT @_ppmv: @dale_wen @RealTadzioM Two years ago there was a minor hurricane in the climate-energy-nerd-community water glass triggered by t…

RT @_ppmv: @dale_wen @RealTadzioM Two years ago there was a minor hurricane in the climate-energy-nerd-community water glass triggered by t…

@dale_wen @RealTadzioM Two years ago there was a minor hurricane in the climate-energy-nerd-community water glass triggered by this paper, although it really said nothing new. You won't get #justcollapse thinking if you don't understand the thinking in thi

@PendulumFlow @chrispydog https://t.co/aG2leR707Y

Wow!

RT @ArtForCC: Batteries are fossil fuels+, toxic, and terrible for the living planet. Is your loyalty with technology and this omnicidal cu…

RT @ArtForCC: Batteries are fossil fuels+, toxic, and terrible for the living planet. Is your loyalty with technology and this omnicidal cu…

RT @ArtForCC: Solar panels are fossil fuels+, toxic, and terrible for the living planet. Is your loyalty with technology and this omnicidal…

RT @ArtForCC: Wind turbines are fossil fuels+, toxic, and terrible for the living planet. Is your loyalty with technology and this omnicida…

Batteries are fossil fuels+, toxic, and terrible for the living planet. Is your loyalty with technology and this omnicidal culture? Or is it with the life support systems of the only planet in the Universe we know supports life? Quote from: https://t.co/B

Wind turbines are fossil fuels+, toxic, and terrible for the living planet. Is your loyalty with technology and this omnicidal culture? Or is it with the life support systems of the only planet in the Universe we know supports life? Quote from: https://t.c

Solar panels are fossil fuels+, toxic, and terrible for the living planet. Is your loyalty with technology and this omnicidal culture? Or is it with the life support systems of the only planet in the Universe we know supports life? Quote from: https://t.co

@geoffmcfarlan @GreenRupertRead More: https://t.co/ihwVospgHL

@JZiehmann In seinem thread gibt P. folgende Quelle an: https://t.co/F8rEslKu5P

@Damo__73_ @QuixoticQuant @CSIRO @simonahac @Bowenchris @AEMO_Energy @clairlemon @DavidOsmond8 Seriously have you even considered how many decades it will take to replace the multitude of steps of mining & processing & manufacturing & transport

@RealGayArbys @Prius_Patrol https://t.co/6lKbmjqJ1j

@quinlanthehuman @TheWarOnCars I highly recommend this paper for the actual materials use required if the plans to try to replace FFs with rebuildables containues: https://t.co/B6EyeSj7kU

RT @MARKBEVIS3: Debunking the green energy transition: Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Tr…

Debunking the green energy transition: Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition Megan K. Seibert and William E. Rees https://t.co/ihwVospgHL

RT @flyoverelitist: If anything renewables are setting us up for failure since they increase energy dependence without reducing fossil fuel…

@kilorico @letsblamerussia @SDonziger @Songstress28 Our numbers for footprint come from sources such as this one: https://t.co/NAuU1vAF7J

@kilorico @letsblamerussia @SDonziger @Songstress28 Unfortunately we don't share that vision because we realize that is a fantasy. We live in the real world. We've studied this issue for years. We can recommend two papers for further study: 1) https://t.c

@kilorico @letsblamerussia @SDonziger @Songstress28 As just one example: "An entire year of production from the world’s largest lithium-ion battery manufacturing facility—Tesla’s $5 billion Gigafactory in Nevada—could store only three minutes’ worth of ann

RT @postcarbonsteve: “no RE source/system is viable if it cannot not generate sufficient energy both to produce itself (literally from the…

RT @SirAbegao: If you happen to read anything seriously today, read this paper by @MeganKmon and my co-advisor, Professor William Rees, pub…

RT @JohnLeePettim13: Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

RT @postcarbonsteve: “no RE source/system is viable if it cannot not generate sufficient energy both to produce itself (literally from the…

RT @postcarbonsteve: “no RE source/system is viable if it cannot not generate sufficient energy both to produce itself (literally from the…

RT @postcarbonsteve: “no RE source/system is viable if it cannot not generate sufficient energy both to produce itself (literally from the…

If anything renewables are setting us up for failure since they increase energy dependence without reducing fossil fuel consumption. Making the inevitable energy descent that much more painful.

RT @postcarbonsteve: “no RE source/system is viable if it cannot not generate sufficient energy both to produce itself (literally from the…

“no RE source/system is viable if it cannot not generate sufficient energy both to produce itself (literally from the ground up) and supply a sufficient surplus for society’s end-use consumption ..no so-called RE technology is in the running” https://t.co/

@RogerCoppock @TXIconoclast Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition https://t.co/jZGiSSaqco The missing risks of climate change https://t.co/pbfRzfD1C4 AR6 WG2 WG2 Far more important than twitarguing w

@mzjacobson @Robert76907841 Saying this, all current technologies appear to have varied and considerable drawbacks - nuclear and PV included. https://t.co/I6csuNFxYD

RT @JohnLeePettim13: Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

@BambrickDaz @DavidOsmond8 @SteveBlumeSEC And it's not just emissions that'll end industrial civilisation. Those other pesky earth system boundaries play their part. https://t.co/AXNaV1Xlir

@MikeHudema The solution is to shrink the human enterprise to live within nature's limits. https://t.co/wdh1x4rW7k

@GuberGerh @MFratzscher @zeitonline 1. CO2-Preis = Rationierung über den Preis (mindestens zunächst). 2. https://t.co/6x1TtldRsd

RT @AndWeavers: Worth a re-read. Lots of numbers. We are not going to get a technological fix for climate change, because technology is a…

Worth a re-read. Lots of numbers. We are not going to get a technological fix for climate change, because technology is a key driver of overshoot. The more we fiddle around and delay, the worse the crash will be. https://t.co/RM5sxGiroq

While fossil fuels (FFs) coal & later oil & natural gas have been humanity’s major source of energy over the past two centuries, 50% of all FFs ever burned have been consumed in the past 30 years (as much as 90% since the early 1940s) as super-expo

Today H sapiens constitute 36% & our domestic livestock another 60%, of a much-expanded mammalian biomass, compared with only 4% for all wild species combined. McRae et al. estimate that the populations of non-human vertebrate species declined by 58% b

@alan2102z @KennethBarrows3 Slow it down please Alan: https://t.co/KdV7dpZflc

RT @geoffmcfarlan: 100% renewables can be done? Bullshit. I have a paper right here. @mzjacobson https://t.co/qmW3AofBGy https://t.…

RT @MARKBEVIS3: Bill Rees again "This analysis makes clear that the pat notion of “affordable clean energy” views the world through a narro…

RT @MARKBEVIS3: Bill Rees again "This analysis makes clear that the pat notion of “affordable clean energy” views the world through a narro…

Bill Rees again "This analysis makes clear that the pat notion of “affordable clean energy” views the world through a narrow keyhole that is blind to innumerable economic, ecological, and social costs." https://t.co/ihwVospgHL

RT @geoffmcfarlan: 100% renewables can be done? Bullshit. I have a paper right here. @mzjacobson https://t.co/qmW3AofBGy https://t.…

RT @geoffmcfarlan: 100% renewables can be done? Bullshit. I have a paper right here. @mzjacobson https://t.co/qmW3AofBGy https://t.…

@mzjacobson https://t.co/6rnm9ksU9g

100% renewables can be done? Bullshit. I have a paper right here. @mzjacobson https://t.co/qmW3AofBGy https://t.co/aFZN7vKzqo

https://t.co/hIrH8QO4Hl

@claudiaperea @EliotJacobson Any if anyone wants to read a thorough analysis of that paper: https://t.co/ydU7FAksm1

@KetanJ0 @EliotJacobson And again, if anyone needs more support for the GND as BAU and greenwashing, please see this well-sourced article: https://t.co/oYUNXQujhg

@KetanJ0 @EliotJacobson You asked another respondent why some people wouldn’t support the green transition. Here you go: https://t.co/oYUNXQujhg

@Zardiz @Mason_Transport @Glazgow @SophiaKianni @ProfMarkMaslin https://t.co/aG2leR707Y

@tomaspueyo The green transition, if not simultaneously coupled with limits to growth is simply not possible https://t.co/oYUNXQujhg We don’t know how to “stop climate change” as stated in 18. James Hansen’s analysis stated there is much more warming arre

@groen @TinneVdS Windenergie produceert evenveel nucleair afval as nucleaire energie: https://t.co/Z0r21XZkfW

@Doc_Valerie @postcarbonsteve Apart from anything else it's the amount of fossil fuel you have to burn to mine, transport and manufacture all the stuff you need to make the transition. So yes, scale, plus some extremely toxic components. This is quite go

@surfNDestroy @Damo__73_ @ProfMarkMaslin Plenty of reasons why it can’t be reality. This article touches on some of them. https://t.co/aG2leR6siq

Really worth a read. The green new deal is a farce when you run the numbers, and this is a good summary of why. Lots of detail but not too dense. https://t.co/RM5sxGiroq

🎁 Vote for the four best covers among 48 issue covers: https://t.co/5Bj5hRZrFx 📚 Issue Cover No. 15: Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition 🔗https://t.co/k1XrUt9ehU @real_gnd @UBC #energytransition

@HMcJeon3y4 @Peters_Glen @Oliver_Geden Where are we on this? Have ~3.5 years of pandemic spread of a SARS virus,* with society now pretty much as fully in denial as on the climate emergency, convinced you yet that only rigorous modeling as @MoiraZellner he

RT @MoiraZellner: Assigned this reading for my system dynamics modeling class: https:// https://t.co/ilFrqQLzbj. Terrifying dose of realism…

RT @Collapsologista: "To adopt a biblical metaphor, it may very well be easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for huma…

"To adopt a biblical metaphor, it may very well be easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for humanity to shift its prevailing paradigm and embark on a planned, voluntary descent from a state of overshoot..." https://t.co/f0auFlVsez

Energies | Free Full-Text | Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition https://t.co/o0lIjD8LBe

@robinmonotti Whilst what they are doing is evil, the concepts of population overrun and resource depletion are very real and pose existential risks. https://t.co/9stcxwiybS

@nickhedley https://t.co/HkS8EeEjbd

RT @JohnLeePettim13: Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

Source: https://t.co/1D1Y7F4UmA

@MarcyFranck @CollapseDiaries @DonaldM47122243 You’ve been seduced by Machine Environmentalism: https://t.co/KdV7dpZflc

RT @JohnLeePettim13: Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

RT @JohnLeePettim13: Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

@LeoVaradkar Source: https://t.co/c9D1IxqDmD

RT @JohnLeePettim13: Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

RT @JohnLeePettim13: Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

RT @JohnLeePettim13: Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

@mzjacobson @RenewablesNow @CKemfert @HJFell @ProfStrachan @BrianVad @ChristianOnRE For every 1 MW of solar panels produced, about 1.4 tonnes of toxic substances (including hydrochloric acid, sodium hydroxide, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, and hydrogen fluor

@micheljanssens @DocuVerite https://t.co/dmRFKlFNtg

RT @JohnLeePettim13: Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

Interesting read about “Green” energies

RT @JohnLeePettim13: Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

RT @JohnLeePettim13: Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

RT @JohnLeePettim13: Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

RT @JohnLeePettim13: Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

RT @JohnLeePettim13: Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

RT @JohnLeePettim13: Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

@InStucco https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk

@weighingin2 @BrianGitt @Karmageddon67 Peer reviewed academic papers have been written about the scale of mining required for “clean” tech. These are easy to find. Here’s one with lots of references. https://t.co/JRzXYVptPC

@hollergirltn @pwagener08 @BrianGitt That actually does seem to be the case. For example this paper was actually peer-reviewed and published their rebuttal of criticisms, but even so the editor declared it an opinion piece after being forced to accept it.

RT @ProtectThPass: @JimGMaloney1 See also Bill Rees' work (https://t.co/B359jxPaoS), Simon Michaux's work, the book Bright Green Lies.

@JimGMaloney1 See also Bill Rees' work (https://t.co/B359jxPaoS), Simon Michaux's work, the book Bright Green Lies.

@OrmeStephan @MorrowJamesAdam @postcarbonsteve Does this person have conflicts of interest or ulterior motives? Are they taking the widest possible vantage point or leaving things out? This reads like a delusional justification for business as usual. htt

Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition https://t.co/6OJrobpEAv

@JoelMCurzon https://t.co/zZHmvf6QRg