Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition
Energies, July 2021
Megan Seibert, William Rees
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 475 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||446||94%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||6||1%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||3||<1%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||12||13%|
|Student > Master||5||6%|
|Student > Bachelor||3||3%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||6||7%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||5||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 458. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,535,155 outputs
Outputs from Energies
of 10,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 426,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energies
of 482 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,535,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,874 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 482 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.