Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk
Source: https://t.co/uisPlJLpLk
@weighingin2 @BrianGitt @Karmageddon67 Peer reviewed academic papers have been written about the scale of mining required for “clean” tech. These are easy to find. Here’s one with lots of references. https://t.co/JRzXYVptPC
@hollergirltn @pwagener08 @BrianGitt That actually does seem to be the case. For example this paper was actually peer-reviewed and published their rebuttal of criticisms, but even so the editor declared it an opinion piece after being forced to accept it.
RT @ProtectThPass: @JimGMaloney1 See also Bill Rees' work (https://t.co/B359jxPaoS), Simon Michaux's work, the book Bright Green Lies.
@JimGMaloney1 See also Bill Rees' work (https://t.co/B359jxPaoS), Simon Michaux's work, the book Bright Green Lies.
@OrmeStephan @MorrowJamesAdam @postcarbonsteve Does this person have conflicts of interest or ulterior motives? Are they taking the widest possible vantage point or leaving things out? This reads like a delusional justification for business as usual. htt
Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition https://t.co/6OJrobpEAv
@Techgnostik @AukeHoekstra @Tesla Sadly incorrect. See all of section 3.1 here: https://t.co/R0eIqshNre
@AukeHoekstra @Tesla Recommended: Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition https://t.co/IULG47EHd9
#JustCollapse requires #OneEarthLiving, and #GlobalOneChild family policy, most of all from developed nations. Renewable energy transition and net-zero are already predicted failures. https://t.co/ReDKMPO8fq #auspol @AdamBandt
@JustCollapse #ManagedCollapse requires #OneEarthLiving and #GlobalOneChild family policies, not consume and grow untill you die. https://t.co/ReDKMPNApS
RT @Jelel_Ezzine: #Degrowth is the only and unique must, not an alternative among several solutions! Energies | Free Full-Text | Through t…
RT @Jelel_Ezzine: #Degrowth is the only and unique must, not an alternative among several solutions! Energies | Free Full-Text | Through t…
#Degrowth is the only and unique must, not an alternative among several solutions! Energies | Free Full-Text | Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition https://t.co/mNOPwhrjFr
@ramblinactivist @Senator_JScherl @dorfman_p All quotes from this well researched, fascinating paper: https://t.co/JRzXYVq1Fa
@geoffmcfarlan Another classic and asks the key question: “How Many People Should (not could) The Earth Support?” https://t.co/AG2c9GZxgw And a modern one re: "green" options: “Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Ener
Aggiungiamo al corpo emergente della letteratura evidenziando le crepe nelle fondamenta della narrativa mainstream della transizione energetica. https://t.co/Do23ZKV9Tw
@MilaOnHere @KHayhoe “Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition” https://t.co/R0eIqshNre
@charliesaito22 Well, that, and also this: https://t.co/R0eIqshNre
“the only viable response to overshoot is a managed contraction of the human enterprise until we arrive within the safely stable territory defined by ecological limits…..many fewer people consuming far less energy and material resources than at present.” h
@HowKeen Filed under "Duh", but I guess it really is news for some folks. https://t.co/R0eIqshNre
RT @iconoclassism: More importantly, read this! All of it. There will NOT be a green transition. There will be DEGROWTH, planned or not. ht…
@EarthKeeper22 @DejectedEarth @GeraldKutney @KaraJarina @Grimnien @ElektraMadrigan @Race2Extinct Sure there are. Here's one https://t.co/R0eIqshNre
@elonmusk Also nope https://t.co/R0eIqshNre
@_HannahRitchie Well, "less bad in the short term" maybe. https://t.co/R0eIqshNre
@EliotJacobson They are incorrect. https://t.co/R0eIqshNre cc @mzjacobson
@ihadira @WilliamJRipple Oh, thanks. Glad you are open to them. I have many ;-) BUT these two are unsurpassed imo. The other one that I think is a 'modern classic' is this one about 'renewables'. (It has been critiqued, but I think the core assessment is a
@CB89178562 They all claim it will as if it’s happening already. There are multiple reasons why it can’t. Many of the materials used actually ARE fossil fuels, let alone the energy. These people are dishonest. https://t.co/aG2leR707Y
@TheLastFarm "It's complicated" but no option scales to 8 billion humans: https://t.co/R0eIqshNre
@JohnLeePettim13 And another: https://t.co/B6EyeSj7kU
@erikengheim @PaulieIsHere @antonioguterres I urge you to read this: https://t.co/aG2leR707Y
@PeterGleick It's a BIT more complicated than that. You need to do more homework: https://t.co/R0eIqshNre
@wolfmaahn @jeffgoodell @AukeHoekstra You should check out the work of Simon Michaux @SimonMichaux. And read this: https://t.co/LrHW3pLSCl And this: https://t.co/JRzXYVq1Fa Also, how do you make mining “cleaner”? Mining completely destroys the land. The
@RobertD11359976 @BazzaCC Can be? No that’s not realistic. What about the materials required? There’s no real replacement for FF materials. https://t.co/aG2leR707Y
RT @Karmageddon67: @KaraJarina @JulianCribb DEGROWTH DEPOPULATION There is no such thing as clean renewable energy. It all has climate i…
@CodeRedEarth Related: https://t.co/R0eIqrZEd6
RT @cketchamwild: "...the [Green New Deal] and its variants grasp in vain for techno-industrial solutions to problems caused by techno-indu…
@hey_alirae @AJEnglish I hope you'll interview Bill Rees and Megan Siebert as part of your series, they wrote this critically important paper: https://t.co/JRzXYVq1Fa
RT @Karmageddon67: The energy return on energy investment (EROEI) of wind power is 14, and solar is 3. FFs are 20-40. Add storage capacity…
The energy return on energy investment (EROEI) of wind power is 14, and solar is 3. FFs are 20-40. Add storage capacity to renewables so that FFs can be replaced for grid electricity and EROEI for wind likely falls to <7 , and solar is probably <1.5.
@JC47053522 @MichaelWestBiz Here’s a reference on the fossil fuel dependence of renewables. https://t.co/aG2leR707Y
RT @Karmageddon67: @redouad Conceptually, renewables are just a lower EROEI extension of fossil fuels. Our civilisation remains totally dep…
@redouad Conceptually, renewables are just a lower EROEI extension of fossil fuels. Our civilisation remains totally dependent on fossil fuels. https://t.co/aG2leRo39Y
@WilliamJGoode1 @Notmistaken @UNEP Conceptually, renewables are just a lower EROEI extension of fossil fuels. Our civilisation remains totally dependent on fossil fuels. @Claireburgo https://t.co/aG2leRo39Y
@ruytero @AukeHoekstra @thejuicemedia Renewables is contingent on continuing to use fossil fuels. https://t.co/aG2leRo39Y
RT @ArtForCC: @Karmageddon67 @stepien_przemek @janrosenow @IEA @SimonMichaux What argument? I'm confused. This is a good article on the amo…
@Karmageddon67 @stepien_przemek @janrosenow @IEA @SimonMichaux What argument? I'm confused. This is a good article on the amount of energy storage needed: https://t.co/JRzXYVq1Fa
@25_cycle @FillmoreWhite @BillyBaldwin We’re not talking about ‘what might be possible’ - we’re talking about what actually happens. So now you’re resorting to ad hominem. You need to do some more reading. https://t.co/aG2leRo39Y
@rick_carmody It’s been calculated that we need an EROI of 17-18 to sustain civilisation. Solar is essentially a supplement. https://t.co/aG2leRo39Y
RT @Karmageddon67: @GeraldKutney @EarthKeeper22 @OntaardeBschvng @KaraJarina @Grimnien @XRScout @Race2Extinct Your ignorance is quite breat…
@GeraldKutney @EarthKeeper22 @OntaardeBschvng @KaraJarina @Grimnien @XRScout @Race2Extinct Your ignorance is quite breathtaking. I suggest you do some more reading on the matter. https://t.co/aG2leRo39Y
Set your coffee/tea cup down, sit back and read this paper ... as the hashtag says #highlycitedpaper Go to @real_gnd and donate to help them keep up this necessary work ...
#mdpienergies #highlycitedpaper Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition 👉 https://t.co/k1XrUt9ehU @real_gnd @UBC #renewableenergy #energytransition #socialjustice https://t.co/PfMKNuEKwj
@dwaynesworld01 For example; read this. Of course I know you won’t. You know it all. https://t.co/aG2leR707Y
@centro_cida Profesor. Más allá de las simples ganas de debatir con alguien que ha estudiado y experimentado más que yo las energías renovables, tengo este dato, que no tengo cómo rebatir: https://t.co/mVEqXtQv2S
RT @MoiraZellner: Assigned this reading for my system dynamics modeling class: https:// https://t.co/ilFrqQLzbj. Terrifying dose of realism…
@mzjacobson Have you seen this god awful anti renewable paper? They cite some of you work as evidence. ⬇️
There is a new insidious form of #climate denial /delay Basically undermine all low carbon generation / end user technology & promote a return to ye olden days with lots of biomass #AirPollution and reduce the earths population to 1 billion people The
This is a crazy anti low C power generation / tech paper. It’s basically #climate delay. “Truly renewable energy sources will be largely based on biomass (especially wood), simple mechanical wind & water generation, passive solar, & animal & h
@mwt2008 @CarolineLucas @climatemessages @SimonClarkeMP @theCCCuk Just read that the #UK will need a fourfold increase in #electricity capacity to meet 2050 net zero target! And I'm afraid it doesn't matter how much more efficient #electrification makes th
@jonathanchait The IEA says that so-called "renewables" (actually rebuildables) will require huge increases in mining to supply the materials. Seibert and Rees lay out the problems with attempting to replace fossil fuels with rebuildables here: https://t.c
@mwt2008 @CarolineLucas @climatemessages @SimonClarkeMP @theCCCuk I'm afraid that you sir are an #electrification evangelist whom is being blinded by #hype which is mostly just 'commitments' and 'targets' from a #UK gov that probably couldn't deliver a tak
Assigned this reading for my system dynamics modeling class: https:// https://t.co/ilFrqQLzbj. Terrifying dose of realism about #greenwashing. Perhaps not the most hopeful way to start the term, but this is precisely what modeling is for. We can do this! W
@lifewithsommer "a non-fossil energy regime simply cannot support anywhere close to the present human population of nearly eight bn; this urgently necessitates reducing human numbers as rapidly as possible to avoid unprecedented levels of social unrest &am
@TEOTWP @ElleSteinhagen Several links in the page I posted deal with those issues. Here's another one: "Through the Eye of a Needle: An Eco-Heterodox Perspective on the Renewable Energy Transition. July 26, 2021" https://t.co/zZHmvf6QRg
@TheCanaryUK @topsy_tee The world & transition to #renewables would stop in their tracks if extraction of #FossilFuels was stopped overnight, there'd be no solar panels, wind turbines or EVs with no #oil #gas #coal May I suggest this very informative r
A few highlights from this incredibly important article: A thread https://t.co/XeOJ6Jk21O
One of the most important articles I've read in a long time is by William Rees and Megan Seibert about the serious problems with renewable energy in our transition away from fossil fuels https://t.co/XeOJ6Jk21O
@7Bluerabbits @106Euan The other billionaire-supported industry that muddies the waters deliberately is the RE/EV industry. So how do you judge what information is correct and what isn’t? If it shows RE/EVs in a good light? https://t.co/aG2leRo39Y
@SimonCTT Have you read this article? https://t.co/ccgPeIxX3V
@j_camachor @LoteRafa @ed_nong @JuanBordera @Shine_McShine @E_Santiago_Muin para casos individuales hay desacoplamiento, aunque no en la magnitud que se necesitaría. Pero fijarse exclusivamente en las emisiones es poner la atención en el síntoma y no en la
@Karmageddon67 @imightbeakulak @Race2Extinct My tweet is a summary of this article. I often summarise, because few people actually open any links. https://t.co/dYcz1hB9ol