↓ Skip to main content

MDPI

Article Metrics

Vocalization Analyses of Nocturnal Arboreal Mammals of the Taita Hills, Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in Diversity (14242818), December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 940)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
13 tweeters
Title
Vocalization Analyses of Nocturnal Arboreal Mammals of the Taita Hills, Kenya
Published in
Diversity (14242818), December 2020
DOI 10.3390/d12120473
Authors

Hanna Rosti, Henry Pihlström, Simon Bearder, Petri Pellikka, Jouko Rikkinen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 177. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2021.
All research outputs
#116,674
of 16,663,134 outputs
Outputs from Diversity (14242818)
#2
of 940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,634
of 360,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diversity (14242818)
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,663,134 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,067 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them