↓ Skip to main content

MDPI

Virtual Prototyping and Validation of Cpps within a New Software Framework †

Overview of attention for article published in Computation, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Virtual Prototyping and Validation of Cpps within a New Software Framework †
Published in
Computation, February 2017
DOI 10.3390/computation5010010
Authors

Sebastian Neumeyer, Konrad Exner, Simon Kind, Haygazun Hayka, Rainer Stark

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 43%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 10%
Computer Science 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Design 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2017.
All research outputs
#17,876,644
of 22,955,959 outputs
Outputs from Computation
#171
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,243
of 310,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computation
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,955,959 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.