Title |
A Machine Learning Approach for Hot-Spot Detection at Protein-Protein Interfaces
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Molecular Sciences, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.3390/ijms17081215 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rita Melo, Robert Fieldhouse, André Melo, João D. G. Correia, Maria Natália D. S. Cordeiro, Zeynep H. Gümüş, Joaquim Costa, Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin, Irina S. Moreira |
Abstract |
Understanding protein-protein interactions is a key challenge in biochemistry. In this work, we describe a more accurate methodology to predict Hot-Spots (HS) in protein-protein interfaces from their native complex structure compared to previous published Machine Learning (ML) techniques. Our model is trained on a large number of complexes and on a significantly larger number of different structural- and evolutionary sequence-based features. In particular, we added interface size, type of interaction between residues at the interface of the complex, number of different types of residues at the interface and the Position-Specific Scoring Matrix (PSSM), for a total of 79 features. We used twenty-seven algorithms from a simple linear-based function to support-vector machine models with different cost functions. The best model was achieved by the use of the conditional inference random forest (c-forest) algorithm with a dataset pre-processed by the normalization of features and with up-sampling of the minor class. The method has an overall accuracy of 0.80, an F1-score of 0.73, a sensitivity of 0.76 and a specificity of 0.82 for the independent test set. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 44% |
France | 1 | 6% |
Canada | 1 | 6% |
Italy | 1 | 6% |
Belgium | 1 | 6% |
Chile | 1 | 6% |
Pakistan | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
Scientists | 6 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 22 | 23% |
Researcher | 19 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 16% |
Unknown | 12 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 31% |
Chemistry | 14 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
Computer Science | 9 | 9% |
Engineering | 8 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 13% |
Unknown | 13 | 14% |