| Title |
A Threshold of Objectively-Assessed Daily Sedentary Time for All-Cause Mortality in Older Adults: A Meta-Regression of Prospective Cohort Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Medicine, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3390/jcm8040564 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Po-Wen Ku, Andrew Steptoe, Yung Liao, Ming-Chun Hsueh, Li-Jung Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,982,854
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#1,852
of 12,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,488
of 349,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Medicine
#57
of 487 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 487 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.