RT @TheStalwart: All around the world, countries got worse at building nuclear power, starting around the 1970s https://t.co/oJwmFXXwsL htt…
RT @TheStalwart: All around the world, countries got worse at building nuclear power, starting around the 1970s https://t.co/oJwmFXXwsL htt…
RT @TheStalwart: All around the world, countries got worse at building nuclear power, starting around the 1970s https://t.co/oJwmFXXwsL htt…
RT @TheStalwart: All around the world, countries got worse at building nuclear power, starting around the 1970s https://t.co/oJwmFXXwsL htt…
RT @TheStalwart: All around the world, countries got worse at building nuclear power, starting around the 1970s https://t.co/oJwmFXXwsL htt…
RT @TheStalwart: All around the world, countries got worse at building nuclear power, starting around the 1970s https://t.co/oJwmFXXwsL htt…
RT @TheStalwart: All around the world, countries got worse at building nuclear power, starting around the 1970s https://t.co/oJwmFXXwsL htt…
RT @TheStalwart: All around the world, countries got worse at building nuclear power, starting around the 1970s https://t.co/oJwmFXXwsL htt…
RT @TheStalwart: All around the world, countries got worse at building nuclear power, starting around the 1970s https://t.co/oJwmFXXwsL htt…
RT @TheStalwart: All around the world, countries got worse at building nuclear power, starting around the 1970s https://t.co/oJwmFXXwsL htt…
All around the world, countries got worse at building nuclear power, starting around the 1970s https://t.co/oJwmFXXwsL https://t.co/bTkj94qDOf
@DanHilt70032640 @HopfJames if people like you hadn't fought against nuclear power since the 1980s? How would that number look like? Different outcome: improved designs, experience, lower CO2 emissions. https://t.co/IyT6sbcO01 Now you try good old gasl
@TheMomaw @Mining_Atoms Get rid of unscientific limitations like the LNT and it would be cheaper than coal. https://t.co/BeAWTwyDci
@VivekGRamaswamy I definitely support shutting down the NRC due to its complete stranglehold on development. If allowed to compete on scientific regulation instead of fear, it would make electricity from fossil fuels obsolete because it would be cheaper th
@PattyforGaPSC Building one nuclear plant is slow and expensive. Building 100 is quick and cheap. Any technology benefits from learning. Here is a study which analyzes what the price of nuclear would be if we followed science instead of fear. https://t.co/
@gadboit @DavidAb10822584 @ClimateHuman It would be cheaper than coal if the crazies left it alone https://t.co/BeAWTwyDci
@twentypiece @cal_abel @DoombergT https://t.co/DrdUAW5NZW We would not have a warming problem.
@KetanJ0 If you care about science of responding to the climate crisis, & not just science proving it exists, then pay attention. Eliot is correct. We have a crisis caused by anti-nuclearism. https://t.co/9oGGYPC7sL Anti-nuclearism was & is curated
@AntoniaKennedyP @ClimateHuman That is quite simplistic. Everything you can lay eyes on right now was made by many multi-national corporations, and if you have solar panels---oh, yeah. The reason we have a problem is anti-nuclear falsehoods. https://t.co/D
@KonstantinKisin @DissocialSpace Actually it's no takedown, b/c Mr. Kisin says the research to solve climate isn't done. #NuclearEnergy has always has been the solution. Our climate problem is b/c anti-nuclear (oil & coal backed/curated) campaigns kill
RT @Quantling: @KonstantinKisin Good. However, no need for scientific breakthroughs. The clean energy system exists. #NuclearEnergy. #nucl…
@KonstantinKisin Good. However, no need for scientific breakthroughs. The clean energy system exists. #NuclearEnergy. #nuclear is the only way through #GlobalWarming. Anti-nuclear "good" activists, the same as current wokeness, created global warming. ht
@Ginsburg @SierraClub Jason. I know you mean well, but Sierra's anti-nuclear position quite literally forced global warming, the greatest menace the human race has ever faced. Sierra Club remains a fortress of deadly propaganda & backward ignorance. ht
@MHGottlieb @aalborg_uni @JakobZinck @BrianVad Verden kunne have været fossilfri med atomkraft https://t.co/TpxPKg98qZ
Nuclear Power Learning & Deployment Rates; Disruption & Global Benefits Forgone https://t.co/TuLSyJuLfG
Nuclear Power Learning & Deployment Rates; Disruption & Global Benefits Forgone: https://t.co/9kWKWyZXUi Comments: https://t.co/d7fGLNQrO4
Nuclear Power Learning & Deployment Rates; Disruption & Global Benefits Forgone https://t.co/1e8UaZFVwi https://t.co/5VTYYr1g37
Nuclear Power Learning & Deployment Rates; Disruption & Global Benefits Forgone https://t.co/8XO98wpsPE
Nuclear Power Learning & Deployment Rates; Disruption & Global Benefits Forgone L: https://t.co/E1V4uc5pWy C: https://t.co/akkJxvOpWx
@JKSteinberger #nuclearpower. The reason we have a climate crisis is anti-nuclear activists. https://t.co/DrdUAW5NZW Solar & wind are fantasy because these sources meet demand by turning supply OFF, not by turning it on. High overcapacity is required m
Nuclear Power Learning and Deployment Rates; Disruption and Global Benefits Forgone https://t.co/fo9QvaBBce #mdpienergies via @energies_mdpi
@Vreivai @jacktymac @iEatCoprolite @thenib @PKuperArt https://t.co/dofVWhISDj Btw the impediments mentioned in the paper is anti nuclear legislation and campaigning Ok now do my other points since the issues are so glaring
@EWGPrez You are the anti-science tool of fossil fuel, that caused the climate crisis. Not the #nuclearpower folks. You. https://t.co/DrdUAW5NZW
@mtaibbi California defeating the anti-nukes who created the climate crisis. The people, governor, and legislature are realizing anti-nuclear is just wrong. https://t.co/DrdUAW5NZW
This is real environmentalism, not the codswallop that created the climate crisis. https://t.co/DrdUAW5NZW
@TedNordhaus This is real environmentalism, not the codswallop that created the climate crisis. https://t.co/DrdUAW5NZW
@ivangayton @wingod @geekethics @SpacerFC I can't link the table directly; you'll have to find table 3 in the article. It's a very confusing table, but the key point is that costs being 1/20 (5%) of what they are today is what *should* have happened. https
@ayndy_randy @Sammy_Roth @latimes Greens CAUSED the climate crisis. The road to hell is paved with good intentions, and built by loud ignorance. https://t.co/DrdUAWmR1W
@paulkrugman https://t.co/DrdUAWmR1W No, Paul. Scientific illiteracy in econ and politics = fantasy non-solution. You have bought lies. All that solar and wind? It cannot do the job. The only thing that can is #NuclearPower #NuclearEnergy. The #ClimateCris
@PeterGleick Peter - The only states that shut down nuclear plants are Democrat states. https://t.co/DrdUAWmR1W #NuclearPower is the only real way to deal with #ClimateCrisis. The #ClimateEmergency EXISTS because of anti-nuclear "liberals" propagandized i
@josh_rog @Noahpinion Millions of lives would have been saved https://t.co/LJHMD4eURH
@collectifission @Unplugnukes @DonaldEBeaneJr @dorfman_p Nuclear power saves lives https://t.co/LJHMD4eURH
@amedsker @jamesHOEHNjr @MadiHilly @esaagar @krystalball Yep, millions of deaths, actually. https://t.co/jbp3QNV0Ig
https://t.co/OdXq7tBpzR "If the pre-reversal learning rates had continued, with the Actual deployment unchanged, until 2015 when cumulative global capacity of construction starts was 497 GW, the OCC of nuclear power would be 5 to 15% of what it was in 201
@Vayod3 “The additional nuclear power could have substituted for 69,000–186,000 TWh of coal and gas generation, thereby avoiding up to 9.5 million deaths and 174 Gt CO2 emissions.” https://t.co/LJHMD4eURH
RT @wallacedodie1: @Nuclearjunkie @J_Lovering @energybants @MadiHilly Anything in this helpful? https://t.co/LJHMD4eURH
RT @Nuclearjunkie: "Had the early rates continued, nuclear power could now be around 10% of its current cost. The additional nuclear power…
RT @Nuclearjunkie: "Had the early rates continued, nuclear power could now be around 10% of its current cost. The additional nuclear power…
RT @Nuclearjunkie: "Had the early rates continued, nuclear power could now be around 10% of its current cost. The additional nuclear power…
"Had the early rates continued, nuclear power could now be around 10% of its current cost. The additional nuclear power could have substituted for 69,000–186,000 TWh of coal and gas generation, thereby avoiding up to 9.5 million deaths and 174 Gt CO2 emiss
@Nuclearjunkie @J_Lovering @energybants @MadiHilly Anything in this helpful? https://t.co/LJHMD4eURH
@Greensky1309 @Ketrowski @ziontree @Atomicrod As I said the issues with NP is primarily political. This paper presents evidence of the disruption of a transition from FF to NP and finds the benefits forgone as a consequence are substantial. Rapid progress
RT @mboudry: Hoe enorm kan de balk in je eigen oog zijn? @Greenpeace heeft zelf enorme klimaatschade aangericht door haar strijd tegen de b…
RT @mboudry: Hoe enorm kan de balk in je eigen oog zijn? @Greenpeace heeft zelf enorme klimaatschade aangericht door haar strijd tegen de b…
RT @mboudry: Hoe enorm kan de balk in je eigen oog zijn? @Greenpeace heeft zelf enorme klimaatschade aangericht door haar strijd tegen de b…
RT @mboudry: Hoe enorm kan de balk in je eigen oog zijn? @Greenpeace heeft zelf enorme klimaatschade aangericht door haar strijd tegen de b…
RT @mboudry: Hoe enorm kan de balk in je eigen oog zijn? @Greenpeace heeft zelf enorme klimaatschade aangericht door haar strijd tegen de b…
RT @mboudry: Hoe enorm kan de balk in je eigen oog zijn? @Greenpeace heeft zelf enorme klimaatschade aangericht door haar strijd tegen de b…
Hoe enorm kan de balk in je eigen oog zijn? @Greenpeace heeft zelf enorme klimaatschade aangericht door haar strijd tegen de beste strategie voor 'ontkoling', wat leidde tot miljarden tonnen onnodige CO2-uitstoot. Maar nu willen ze politici vervolgen? /3
@callitoutnow @KwasiKwarteng See these on deployment costs: https://t.co/0NK77hPpru https://t.co/qhimsJeGPc
RT @Christi26980927: @Gen_Atomic Nuclear power should never ever be phased out. The world nuclear fleet should be exspanded. We need to res…
@Gen_Atomic Nuclear power should never ever be phased out. The world nuclear fleet should be exspanded. We need to resume the trend we saw in 1970s and 1980s, before it was desrupted by the fossil fuel funded anti-nuclear movement https://t.co/mOd5Yv4Jg5 h
@TinneVdS What could have been if it not was for the denier movement. As at study from 2017 conclude. https://t.co/mOd5Yv4Jg5 https://t.co/JnqXe6u7Zt
@TinneVdS What could have been if it not was for the denier movement. As at study from 2017 conclude. https://t.co/mOd5Yv4Jg5 https://t.co/ko5bjiMjlP
@Gen_Atomic The world should build more nuclear power plants, and resume the desrupted trend from the 1970s. @BorisJohnson god nuclear. It is nuclear or fossil fuels. https://t.co/mOd5Yv4Jg5 https://t.co/twqknTVe5S
@JohnDWalke @EPAMichaelRegan If it wasn't for the anti-nuclear movement, "nuclear power could now be around 10% of its current cost. The additional nuclear power could have substituted for 69,000–186,000 TWh of coal and gas generation, thereby avoiding up
The regulatory environment for nuclear seems to have been designed to make it expensive starting in the 1970s. See this paper: https://t.co/PSir4dmeI8 https://t.co/Jyj2jHWaGl
@rahmdphd @gray_jedi_ @mattyglesias @0K_ultra Details on the damages anti nuclearism caused are here: I don't have anything bookmarked on the anti hydro efforts, but that was far less successful: https://t.co/9ONU2Vgo3X
@moylecroft @simonahac @cat240359 Glacial, awful? Are you sure your assessments don't reflect unconscious bias? Actually there's a study of nuclear learning rates https://t.co/6xsUeB4x1x not nearly as pessimistic, like "Rapid progress was achieved in the p
@ziontree This paper presents evidence of the disruption of a transition from fossil fuels to nuclear power, and finds the benefits forgone as a consequence are substantial. https://t.co/LJHMD4eURH
@PeterAhlberg5 @ziontree This paper presents evidence of the disruption of a transition from fossil fuels to nuclear power, and finds the benefits forgone as a consequence are substantial. https://t.co/LJHMD4eURH Potential to displace fossil fuels with nuc
@NICKtrancelover @ziontree @Nuklearia Look at where we could be at if we hadn't forgone clean NP. https://t.co/LJHMD3Xjt7
@epicurus_atar @SLSingh @WazzaMcI @isaboemeke This paper presents evidence of the disruption of a transition from fossil fuels to nuclear power, and finds the benefits forgone as a consequence are substantial. https://t.co/LJHMD4eURH
@TheEconomist This paper presents evidence of the disruption of a transition from fossil fuels to nuclear power, and finds the benefits forgone as a consequence are substantial. https://t.co/LJHMD4eURH
RT @wallacedodie1: @ziontree This paper presents evidence of the disruption of a transition from fossil fuels to nuclear power, and finds t…
@ziontree This paper presents evidence of the disruption of a transition from fossil fuels to nuclear power, and finds the benefits forgone as a consequence are substantial. https://t.co/LJHMD4eURH
This paper presents evidence of the disruption of a transition from fossil fuels to nuclear power, and finds the benefits forgone as a consequence are substantial. https://t.co/LJHMD4eURH
@TraleeAnneMarie @Daniel_W_See @ProfSteveKeen @TheNarrator000 @mark_lynas Great! Then you should be interested in this. These are too technical for most laypeople, should be fine for U. https://t.co/eJyxFSwehC https://t.co/B6axBmNDhl https://t.co/8As1He43C
Chernobyl killed 750k liquidators and rendered 10 kilometers uninhabitable. Thousands of birth defects caused. Uranium miners have 6 times higher cancer rates. So yah go ahead and cut butter with a chainsaw.
RT @wallacedodie1: @JackNaneek @mark_lynas @ProfSteveKeen Absolutely. NP has caused fewer deaths than one airline crash over its entire his…
RT @wallacedodie1: @JackNaneek @mark_lynas @ProfSteveKeen Absolutely. NP has caused fewer deaths than one airline crash over its entire his…
@JackNaneek @mark_lynas @ProfSteveKeen Absolutely. NP has caused fewer deaths than one airline crash over its entire history, meanwhile FF pollution kills 1000’s of ppl every single day. disruption of a transition from FF to nuclear power consequences are
RT @TrivialGravitas: @JosephMerriwet1 @wesyang 10-20% of all carbon ever emitted by humanity is the fault of environmentalists via anti nuc…
RT @wallacedodie1: @ewarren @CNN In 2015 alone, nuclear power could have replaced up to 100% of coal-generated and 76% of gas-generated ele…
@WoopsWoah @pinkheretic @DeityFree @ChristiAnne67 Who cares if you HAVE to run it flat out. To use it as a peaker is to use a linebacker to quarterback. There are multiple technologies that be used as peaker plants. https://t.co/50rjjZ4TgA Contains plen
RT @AlexNowrasteh: That’s huge. https://t.co/FFbuQoxGo5 https://t.co/8iavi3ThR4
This is what happens when environmentalism resembles religion more than science.
RT @AlexNowrasteh: That’s huge. https://t.co/FFbuQoxGo5 https://t.co/8iavi3ThR4
RT @AlexNowrasteh: That’s huge. https://t.co/FFbuQoxGo5 https://t.co/8iavi3ThR4
That’s huge. https://t.co/FFbuQoxGo5 https://t.co/8iavi3ThR4